<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 6794/0 &#124; 52.74</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jonathanlipps.com/blog/2005/11/67940-5274/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jonathanlipps.com/blog/2005/11/67940-5274/</link>
	<description>Creativity &#38;&#38; Integration</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 01:06:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.jonathanlipps.com/blog/2005/11/67940-5274/comment-page-1/#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 19:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonathanlipps.com/blog/?p=305#comment-169</guid>
		<description>Impressive. You are now officially a music+computer geek!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Impressive. You are now officially a music+computer geek!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Nyffeler</title>
		<link>http://www.jonathanlipps.com/blog/2005/11/67940-5274/comment-page-1/#comment-170</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Nyffeler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 19:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonathanlipps.com/blog/?p=305#comment-170</guid>
		<description>That is so completly awesome. I sympathize with every aspect of this entry. Particularly about the daunting task of rating so many unrated songs. My problem is that music seems to enter my library faster than I can even listen to it all, let alone rate it. The plus side of this is that, since the music in my library is most likely something I like (I put it there), I can put it in shuffle mode (which its in 90% of the time) and often songs I havent heard before come up and I happen to like them. This is such a good feeling because its like I&#039;m passively discovering good music! (though I guess I already discovered it, even if I havent listened to it all the way through).

Which brings me to the point that I&#039;m not nearly as disciplined as you. I tend to rate songs in the 1st minute because I feel like I have a sense of it. A down side to rating while working, like I do, is that its harder to pay close attention to lyrical content, meaning sometimes i&#039;ll rate a stupid song high or pass over a gem because i wasnt paying close enough attention to the words.

My rating standard is pretty easy to adhere to:
5 stars - I absolutely adore it, musically and lyrically. Also I am proud to like the song (no guilty pleasures get 5 stars)
4 stars - I have some sort of good feeling toward the song and I would be happy to put it on a compilation for someone.
3 stars - I have no feelings about the song. Its a song that I&#039;ll just as likely FF&#039;d as listen to all the way through.
2 stars - I dont really like the song, but it stays in the library (sometimes because its part of a beloved artist&#039;s catalogue, sometimes becuase I have faith that someday I will like it more)
1 star - Delete from library. Because its often a bit harder to delete songs as your listening to them (if youre in a playlist you have to switch to the library and find the song, or if you arent even using the iTunes interface and instead navigating you music with a taskbar app) I indicate a hated song with a one star. Then I can do periodic Spring cleaning on the songs I dont like.

So anyway, I dont think I&#039;m anywhere close to being where you are. I think I have a little under 1000 songs unrated out of about 7800 (i couldnt tell you now becuase I&#039;m on my work computer, on which i keep only about half my music).

Speaking of too much music, as of July or so, my library outgrew my iPod. The first person to get me a â¥40G iPod for Christmas wins.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is so completly awesome. I sympathize with every aspect of this entry. Particularly about the daunting task of rating so many unrated songs. My problem is that music seems to enter my library faster than I can even listen to it all, let alone rate it. The plus side of this is that, since the music in my library is most likely something I like (I put it there), I can put it in shuffle mode (which its in 90% of the time) and often songs I havent heard before come up and I happen to like them. This is such a good feeling because its like I&#8217;m passively discovering good music! (though I guess I already discovered it, even if I havent listened to it all the way through).</p>
<p>Which brings me to the point that I&#8217;m not nearly as disciplined as you. I tend to rate songs in the 1st minute because I feel like I have a sense of it. A down side to rating while working, like I do, is that its harder to pay close attention to lyrical content, meaning sometimes i&#8217;ll rate a stupid song high or pass over a gem because i wasnt paying close enough attention to the words.</p>
<p>My rating standard is pretty easy to adhere to:<br />
5 stars &#8211; I absolutely adore it, musically and lyrically. Also I am proud to like the song (no guilty pleasures get 5 stars)<br />
4 stars &#8211; I have some sort of good feeling toward the song and I would be happy to put it on a compilation for someone.<br />
3 stars &#8211; I have no feelings about the song. Its a song that I&#8217;ll just as likely FF&#8217;d as listen to all the way through.<br />
2 stars &#8211; I dont really like the song, but it stays in the library (sometimes because its part of a beloved artist&#8217;s catalogue, sometimes becuase I have faith that someday I will like it more)<br />
1 star &#8211; Delete from library. Because its often a bit harder to delete songs as your listening to them (if youre in a playlist you have to switch to the library and find the song, or if you arent even using the iTunes interface and instead navigating you music with a taskbar app) I indicate a hated song with a one star. Then I can do periodic Spring cleaning on the songs I dont like.</p>
<p>So anyway, I dont think I&#8217;m anywhere close to being where you are. I think I have a little under 1000 songs unrated out of about 7800 (i couldnt tell you now becuase I&#8217;m on my work computer, on which i keep only about half my music).</p>
<p>Speaking of too much music, as of July or so, my library outgrew my iPod. The first person to get me a â¥40G iPod for Christmas wins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Lipps</title>
		<link>http://www.jonathanlipps.com/blog/2005/11/67940-5274/comment-page-1/#comment-171</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Lipps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 19:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonathanlipps.com/blog/?p=305#comment-171</guid>
		<description>I like your standard, Chris, but it&#039;s a bit too strict for me. Mine would be yours with the star measurements shifted up about .5 per description. Here&#039;s mine:

5 stars - I&#039;m pretty much always in the mood to listen to this song / I&#039;d get really excited if it came on in a random rotation of my entire playlist / I&#039;m very proud to like this song

4 stars - I consider this song very good, and would put it on compilations / I consider this song very good, but it&#039;s new to my library and I don&#039;t want to jump the gun by saying it&#039;s a favorite

3 stars - This song is alright. I probably wouldn&#039;t recommend it passionately, but I enjoy listening to it.

2 stars - This song is just OK. I&#039;d just as soon FF&#039;d as listen to it. Maybe a 60% chance of FF&#039;d.

1 star - I don&#039;t like this song, but I&#039;m keeping it because I own the CD and I want my whole CD library on my iTunes / The song&#039;s OK but I&#039;d never want it to come up in a rotation (like Christmas songs for example) / It&#039;s not really a song (like language learning audio files)

Also, I don&#039;t really take lyrics into account. If I happen to know and really love a song&#039;s lyrics (e.g. &lt;i&gt;Diamond Ring&lt;/i&gt;, by Pedro the Lion), it could bump it up. And, as often happened with Christian rock songs, if I found the lyrics particularly saccharine or irritating, the rating would be demoted for lyrical reasons. But for the most part, I was going by how the song made me feel, and the lyrics only insofar as they played into that.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like your standard, Chris, but it&#8217;s a bit too strict for me. Mine would be yours with the star measurements shifted up about .5 per description. Here&#8217;s mine:</p>
<p>5 stars &#8211; I&#8217;m pretty much always in the mood to listen to this song / I&#8217;d get really excited if it came on in a random rotation of my entire playlist / I&#8217;m very proud to like this song</p>
<p>4 stars &#8211; I consider this song very good, and would put it on compilations / I consider this song very good, but it&#8217;s new to my library and I don&#8217;t want to jump the gun by saying it&#8217;s a favorite</p>
<p>3 stars &#8211; This song is alright. I probably wouldn&#8217;t recommend it passionately, but I enjoy listening to it.</p>
<p>2 stars &#8211; This song is just OK. I&#8217;d just as soon FF&#8217;d as listen to it. Maybe a 60% chance of FF&#8217;d.</p>
<p>1 star &#8211; I don&#8217;t like this song, but I&#8217;m keeping it because I own the CD and I want my whole CD library on my iTunes / The song&#8217;s OK but I&#8217;d never want it to come up in a rotation (like Christmas songs for example) / It&#8217;s not really a song (like language learning audio files)</p>
<p>Also, I don&#8217;t really take lyrics into account. If I happen to know and really love a song&#8217;s lyrics (e.g. <i>Diamond Ring</i>, by Pedro the Lion), it could bump it up. And, as often happened with Christian rock songs, if I found the lyrics particularly saccharine or irritating, the rating would be demoted for lyrical reasons. But for the most part, I was going by how the song made me feel, and the lyrics only insofar as they played into that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Daugherty</title>
		<link>http://www.jonathanlipps.com/blog/2005/11/67940-5274/comment-page-1/#comment-172</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Daugherty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 19:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonathanlipps.com/blog/?p=305#comment-172</guid>
		<description>how can you not take lyrics more seriously?  The world was created with a word, it was with the challenge of the meaning of words that the serpent tempted eve and it is by the Word we are re-created.  Words are intensely important and it drives me mad when people listen to music without paying attention to the words.  (Please don&#039;t whistle while you read this comment, else you may be distracted from what I&#039;m saying).
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how can you not take lyrics more seriously?  The world was created with a word, it was with the challenge of the meaning of words that the serpent tempted eve and it is by the Word we are re-created.  Words are intensely important and it drives me mad when people listen to music without paying attention to the words.  (Please don&#8217;t whistle while you read this comment, else you may be distracted from what I&#8217;m saying).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJ Friesen</title>
		<link>http://www.jonathanlipps.com/blog/2005/11/67940-5274/comment-page-1/#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator>TJ Friesen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 19:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonathanlipps.com/blog/?p=305#comment-173</guid>
		<description>i don&#039;t rate anything.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i don&#8217;t rate anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

